Lake Show Life
Fansided

Los Angeles Lakers: 5 reasons not to trade for Chris Paul

By Robert Marvi

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - MARCH 06: (NEW YORK DAILIES OUT) Chris Paul #3 of the Oklahoma City Thunder in action against the New York Knicks at Madison Square Garden on March 06, 2020 in New York City. The Thunder defeated the Knicks 126-103. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images)
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - MARCH 06: (NEW YORK DAILIES OUT) Chris Paul #3 of the Oklahoma City Thunder in action against the New York Knicks at Madison Square Garden on March 06, 2020 in New York City. The Thunder defeated the Knicks 126-103. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
6 of 6
Next
Los Angeles Lakers
(Photo by Douglas P. DeFelice/Getty Images) – Los Angeles Lakers /

1. It will take too much to trade for Chris Paul

Even if Paul would give the Los Angeles Lakers two more strong seasons like the one he just had in OKC, will fit in perfectly with their style of play and avoid injury, the team will simply have to give up too much to land him.

Danny Green is a nice trading chip with the $15 million that’s owed to him next season, and Kyle Kuzma is also a nice piece, as he may break out on a different team.

But the Lakers will also have to give up some combination of Alex Caruso, Avery Bradley, Javale McGee, or Kentavious Caldwell-Pope.

In addition, the Thunder are rebuilding and are stockpiling draft picks. I’m guessing, at a minimum, they’ll demand L.A.’s first-round pick in this year’s upcoming NBA draft.

All that is a bridge too far. First, as we previously discussed, it would greatly deplete the team’s supporting cast and reduce their tools under salary cap rules to replenish that depth.

Second, considering the team will be over the cap with or without Paul, they need to keep their draft picks unless they’re trading for a third star who’s in his 20s and presents no real risks.

If Paul comes on board and nothing bad happens in terms of the risks I mentioned, he still won’t be a long-term choice. That means they’ll be left to reload in a year or two.

Next. Best destinations for Kyle Kuzma in a trade. dark

Even with Paul’s contract off the books, replacing those role players, especially Bradley and Caruso, won’t be as easy as it seems, as those two possess unique skills and qualities.

Home/Lakers Rumors