Grading every Lakers signing during NBA free agency

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - APRIL 11: Taurean Prince #12 of the Minnesota Timberwolves attempts a shot betweem D'Angelo Russell #1 and Anthony Davis #3 of the Los Angeles Lakers during the first half in a play-in tournament game at Crypto.com Arena on April 11, 2023 in Los Angeles, California. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Harry How/Getty Images)
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - APRIL 11: Taurean Prince #12 of the Minnesota Timberwolves attempts a shot betweem D'Angelo Russell #1 and Anthony Davis #3 of the Los Angeles Lakers during the first half in a play-in tournament game at Crypto.com Arena on April 11, 2023 in Los Angeles, California. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Harry How/Getty Images)
5 of 6
D'Angelo Russell Lakers
(Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images) – D’Angelo Russell

Lakers re-sign D’Angelo Russell: C+

D’Angelo Russell is coming off of a horrible Western Conference Finals that saw all of his issues come to light. Casual basketball fans see Russell’s ball-handling and shot-making ability and mistake that for greatness (in large part because that is what AAU culture has created as good basketball).

When in reality, Russell has serious flaws that hurt a team. There is a reason why every team that has had him was in no rush to keep him. He gets ice cold, can check out of games mentally and doesn’t make the right plays or rotations on defense.

We said it here at Lake Show Life when the Lakers traded for him: Russell has similar tendencies as Russell Westbrook, but not as bad. What made D’Lo so much better is he wasn’t draining the locker room and he can get hot with his shooting.

So why is this a C+ instead of a bad grade? Well, the Lakers kind of had to do it. The alternative was letting Russell walk in free agency. If that happened, the Lakers couldn’t simply recoup the cap space they spent on Russell as they spent it using Bird Rights.

At two years for $39 million the Lakers are not paying an arm and a leg for Russell and it won’t hurt the team in the long run. Heck, it wouldn’t be that shocking if Russell is traded at the deadline or next summer for a larger return. Keep the asset now, figure out the rest later.