Los Angeles Lakers: 3 reasons Lance Stephenson was a bad signing
2. Lance Stephenson’s up-and-down 3-point shooting
One of the biggest gripes that the national media had with the Lakers free agent signings was the apparent lack of 3-point shooting. 3-point shooting figured to be one of the Lakers key areas to improve in the offseason, as they ranked second-to-last in 3P%.
They seemed to ignore that need, as Rajon Rondo and JaVale McGee aren’t 3-point shooters, while Michael Beasley is efficient, but on a low volume of attempts.
Lance Stephenson has had good 3-point shooting seasons, but for the most part, he’s been average or below average from deep. His best season in regards to 3-point efficiency was in the 2015-16 season, where he shot 40.4 percent from three, but on a low 1.1 attempts per game. His best season overall from three was probably his best overall season which was the 2013-14 season with the Indiana Pacers. In that season he shot 35.2 percent on 3.1 attempts.
His career seemed over in the 2016-17 season, as he bounced between three teams during the course of the season, while only playing in 18 games. His career re-surged last season with the Pacers, but it wasn’t because of his 3-point shot. He shot 28.9 percent from the 3-point line, with a below average 31.9 percent clip on catch-and-shoot threes, theoretically the easiest type of 3-point shot.
Rob Pelinka has referenced the young Lakers’ somewhat efficient 3-point shooting from last year in defense of the team’s free agency decisions, but that’s a lot of pressure on the young ones to improve the team’s overall 3-point shooting from last year.
The Lakers will need great improvement because a team who ranks second-to-last in 3P% will not likely make the playoffs in the Western Conference. LeBron James will obviously help, but Stephenson will more than likely not help unless he can reinvigorate his early career 3-point shooting.