The Los Angeles Lakers paid more than even staunch Walker Kessler fans likely expected for the promising young big man. Los Angeles not only handed him a four-year, $129,467,930 contract, but gave up two unprotected first-round picks and a pair of pick swaps in the sign-and-trade with the Utah Jazz.
The Lakers' logic behind the overpay is surprisingly sound: They effectively gave those assets up not just for Kessler, but Luka Doncic, as well.
Though it's the detail so many harp on, it's easy to still lose sight of the fact that Los Angeles acquired Doncic for pennies on the dollar. Parting with Max Christie and Anthony Davis was by no means easy, but Los Angeles only gave up one first-round draft pick for a then five-time All-NBA First Team honoree who had led the Dallas Mavericks to the NBA Finals mere months prior to the trade.
According to Marc Stein of The Stein Line, the Lakers thus see the move for Kessler as not just the acquisition of one player, but the redistribution of assets the Doncic move should've cost them.
"Yet I'm told that the Lakers were emboldened to go to such lengths to acquire Kessler in large part because they acquired Luka Dončić from Dallas on such favorable terms in February 2025...The trade assets preserved in that heist, in other words, helped nudge the Lakers to a place where they believed they could withstand spending so big on Kessler."
Though it's easy to formulate an emotional response and brush those thoughts aside, there's logic behind them and a strong rationale combatting disbelief.
Lakers spent big on Walker Kessler because of the Luka Doncic trade
The Lakers effectively traded three unprotected first-round draft picks and two pick swaps for Doncic and Kessler. There's more to it than that, of course, but those are effectively the core details in an NBA where non-stars are fetching multiple first-round picks.
Acquiring one of the five best players in the world and honoring his request for a high-level starting center for what's become the draft-pick-price of one starter is thus a steal.
Perhaps the Lakers could've paid less for Kessler and utilized the assets saved during the Doncic deal to build out the rotation with another quality player or two. Their most pressing need was that of an interior anchor, however, particularly on the defensive end of the floor.
In Kessler, the Lakers landed a 24-year-old center with mountains of untapped potential and career averages of 2.4 blocks per game and 3.4 blocks per 36 minutes.
It was thus an investment in not just Kessler, but what he represents to the franchise. They not only gave the franchise player the interior anchor he needed and requested, but took the initiative to fit the youth movement with a high-level player who could set the tone for the other developing players around him.
Considering the Lakers paid for Doncic and Kessler what many would've thought they'd have to give up for Doncic alone, the front office's logic in justifying the overpay for the big man is sound.
Add us as a preferred source on Google